Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Quaker-Dokubo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure)  Dr vulpes  (💬 • 📝) 04:49, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Charles Quaker-Dokubo

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Subject is not notable, fails WP:GNG and WP:PROF. Most sources are only passing mentions, the two sources that give the most support are a transcript of an interview and one about his recent death.  Dr vulpes  (💬 • 📝) 05:09, 26 August 2022 (UTC) Weak Keep: Special Adviser to the President of any Country, especially one with a dedicated ministry such as Ministry of Niger Delta Affairs is a good claim of notability. Weak because it is not an elective position. For what it 's worth, his predecessor (Paul Boroh) was notable. HandsomeBoy (talk) 22:22, 1 September 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:15, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Academics and educators,  and Africa.  Dr vulpes  (💬 • 📝) 05:09, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:37, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 04:30, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete I’m not completely convinced that the subject’s special adviser roles would make them notable, but I’d be more inclined to agree if there was anything substantive to be said about his work in those roles - i.e. if the article focused on the things that provide the claim of notability that would make sense. However the article says nothing about them so they don’t seem, after all, to have been that important. Mccapra (talk) 07:08, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep, I was able to find lots of sources in major Nigerian newspapers about this man, in addition to the obituaries I could find sources such as this in Vanguard, this in Sahara Reporters and this in P.M. News, among many other sources. In short, he clearly passes WP:GNG. Devonian Wombat (talk) 03:01, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. I'm not convinced he passes WP:PROF but with plenty of national-level news coverage for his work for the amnesty program, his removal from the program and rebel threats to resume fighting after his removal, and for his recent death, he appears to pass WP:GNG. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:53, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep David Eppstein makes a fair point, closing AfD.  Dr vulpes  (💬 • 📝) 04:49, 15 September 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.