Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles R. Gallagher III


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:34, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

Charles R. Gallagher III

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Originally tagged for speedy deletion, I believe this page requires further discussion. Someone closely connected to the subject (who is an attorney) appears to have provided the bulk of the text, and it's a close call whether the subject meets our article guidelines. I believe that the subject is article-worthy although the page in its present form does not meet our high standards for independent sourcing. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 17:39, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:32, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:32, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable.--Epeefleche (talk) 19:34, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete with no prejudice per WP:CRYSTAL. This attorney has been practicing for ten years, and may become notable, but he is far from there.  He's never taught at a college or law school; he's not a partner at a major law firm; he hasn't chaired any ABA or state bar committees or sections; his only awards are of the local "best young lawyer" or "up-and-coming" variety. Maybe he'll become notable, but until then, delete. 17:52, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.