Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles River Center


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was no consensus. Mr.  Z- man  04:04, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

Charles River Center

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable strip center in Massachusetts, fails WP:RS. Ten Pound Hammer • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 02:31, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete: Another non notable shopping center. Although, a redirect to the city may be appropriate.  - Rjd0060 (talk) 04:59, 28 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 12:53, 4 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malls-related deletions.  -- A. B. (talk) 17:47, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malls-related deletions.  -- A. B. (talk) 17:47, 4 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletions.  -- A. B. (talk) 17:48, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - They didn't have to do anything, but they did, to save a wetland habitat. WP:RS + WP:N are now satisfied. Exit2DOS2000   •T•C•  05:27, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
 * ...Barely. Ten Pound Hammer  • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 16:57, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
 * ...Barely. Ten Pound Hammer  • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 16:57, 5 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete as another small not notable mall. The claimed notability is on a par with other malls giving money to some group.  Simply not notable. Vegaswikian (talk) 01:10, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep as rewritten, the article now meets verifiability with multiple reliable sources. RFerreira (talk) 00:05, 10 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.