Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Rollings


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 02:53, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Charles Rollings

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:BLP of a writer, which does little more than assert that he exists, and sources it only to his "our authors" page on the website of his own publisher. A writer does not automatically become entitled to a Wikipedia article just because his existence can be verified in primary sources; rather, reliable source coverage must be present to support a claim of notability that passes WP:AUTHOR. Delete, without prejudice against future recreation if his sourceability improves. Bearcat (talk) 21:57, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
 * As the stub creator, I noted that Rollings's books are cited in at least ten WP articles on POW subjects, meriting some more information on him. However, I respect both the objection and the AfD outcome. Bjenks (talk) 02:00, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete - Not even any minimal signs of WP:CREATIVE notability. SwisterTwister   talk  05:56, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  17:06, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete no indication he comes anywhere near to reaching the level of notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:54, 6 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.