Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Sabourin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. restored article. I'd appreciate some of you adding this article to your Watchlist to prevent any future hijackings. Liz Read! Talk! 05:05, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

Charles Sabourin

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

No indication of passing WP:GNG of WP:NPEOPLE, most substantial part of article was a copyvio and I can find no indication of notability in a BEFORE search. Seawolf35 (talk - email) 02:47, 14 November 2023 (UTC) Comment - Now the article it is restored to an article about a French pathologist, I have added 2 more citations. I can't find a reference to where he went to school or when he opened his clinic, but have referenced birth and death and the hospital named in his honor. How should we proceed now? vote on the pathologist's article? Thanks. --WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 19:05, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Psychology. Seawolf35 (talk - email) 02:47, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment: There has been some article hijacking going on here — the article is, but (I'd have linked to the actual diff of the change, but that was also the addition of the copyvio)… and . No opinion on the merits of the article on the original subject, but I can't imagine there's any notability for the Canadian artist… at best there should be a reversion.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  05:17, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
 * @Wcquidditch I do believe my point about the notability still stands even with the prior versions of the article. Seawolf35 (talk - email) 13:13, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists, Medicine, France,  and Canada.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  05:18, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Restore article to 19th C pathologist, and keep it for the moment. If anyone wants to nominate it for AfD they're welcome, but we shouldn't delete a 19th C scientist merely because someone's decided to nick their article for a Canadian artist. Go that way and I can get Charles Darwin deleted by hijacking the article to write about my dog, Darwin. Elemimele (talk) 15:06, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Restore article to 19th C pathologist. Agree with Elemimele, and add that the article has been hijacked (badly) twice by in 2018 and 2023. --WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 01:26, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep Restored Version about the 19th century pathologist. References have been vastly improved over the unreferenced biography that was originally nominated for deletion. Elspea756 (talk) 00:00, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment - I think we should Keep Restored Version about the 19th century pathologist as well, but don't know how best to add or change my vote from Restore to Keep Restored Version. Guidance requested. Thanks --WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 17:46, 18 November 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.