Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Vandervaart


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (No prejudice against speedy renomination). Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  15:25, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Charles Vandervaart

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:BLP of a teen actor, not yet demonstrated or properly sourced as passing WP:NACTOR. Whereas NACTOR requires multiple major roles, Vandervaart has had one major role and a bunch of minor supporting ones -- and the sourcing here rests entirely on community weekly pennysavers in his own hometown rather than major market dailies, so there aren't sufficient grounds to claim that he passes WP:GNG yet. One noteworthy role would be enough if he got an award nomination, or if the sourcing showed that he was getting much more widespread media coverage, for it -- but one noteworthy role is not enough to confer an automatic presumption of notability on an actor just because he exists. As always, no prejudice against recreation in the future if and when he has a stronger notability claim and better sourcing for it, but neither the sourcing nor the substance present here are good enough yet. Bearcat (talk) 18:43, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:18, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:18, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete does not meet the inclusion criteria for actors.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:50, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  So Why  13:58, 13 July 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  So Why  09:26, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:10, 24 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.