Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Veitch


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Lankiveil (speak to me) 23:19, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Charles Veitch

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The absence of any background information indicates to me that this guy is not sufficiently notable to warrant a "biography" on Wikipedia Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 17:34, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep - there are good sources with which to beef up the biographical details. Bearian (talk) 19:17, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - It's April 1, hard to tell the jokes from the real AfDs. Particularly so in this case, the claim to importance so weak and the sourcing so poor... Fails GNG. Carrite (talk) 21:42, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep - I created this article before April 1st; I have been editing Wikipedia for over two years and at no time have I created a joke article. It now has three sources, plus his youtube channel.  I will add more material to the article when time permits.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fountainofignorance (talk • contribs) 05:48, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:04, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:04, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:04, 2 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete This guy is a minor blogger who has not received the widespread coverage in multiple reliable sources to pass GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:57, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 01:23, 9 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Weak delete He's borderline, but I just don't think that he's received the necessary secondary coverage. The fact that the BBC article doesn't even mention the 9/11 stuff makes me think that coverage of his views was minor, even though Slate did have an article about him. Orser67 (talk) 23:09, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Interview-based articles are not independent. The BBC link is not in depth and completely fails WP:CRIME. Stuartyeates (talk) 22:04, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete this is just not good enough. Barney the barney barney (talk) 20:12, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.