Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles W. Goodier


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 07:39, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

Charles W. Goodier

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Mayors are not "inherently" notable just because they exist and pass WP:NPOL. Just because he was a mayor does not mean that he deserves an article. Just an average mayor of a small village in New York state. FatCat96 (talk) 21:48, 17 October 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:15, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and New York. FatCat96 (talk) 21:48, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment If they satisfy WP:NPOL they are presumed notable and may have an article. In this case, I would say the subject does not satisfy WP:NPOL. However, that in itself gives no indication into their lack of notability. Regards,--Goldsztajn (talk) 02:57, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete Not satisfying WP:NPOL does indicate that they are not presumed to be notable (lack of a presumption, not the same as a presumption that they are not notable) but I was unable to find significant coverage outside of the Buffalo News obituary, fails WP:GNG --DannyS712 (talk) 03:02, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: Mid-century small town mayor, I can't find coverage about him. Oaktree b (talk) 15:44, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete doesn't meet WP:GNG, being the mayor of a town with a population of roughly 3,000 (at the time of his term) certainly doesn't meet WP:NPOL. Best, GPL93 (talk) 20:59, 25 October 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.