Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Wallert


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. I,m sorry Qb27 but there are apparently no sources that demonstrate notability. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:12, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

Charles Wallert

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This article was deleted per a proposed deletion last year and was recently recreated. The tone is strongly promotional with little substance, and I have not seen any nontrivial coverage in reliable sources that would indicate that he meets WP:CREATIVE or WP:GNG. VQuakr (talk) 07:31, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:44, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:33, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep This article should be kept. All the information is easily crossed referenced with song titles, artists & events from other websites as well as many other articles & publications. A simple search would prove this beyond any doubt. Here is a person with 35 years of music work. Just the fact that he has served as president of the Society of Singers, Chapter East is extremely noteworthy. The Community work is also verifiable. In closing, one person cannot arbitrarily dismiss an extensive body of work without bothering to take the time to do the research. Independent verification supports overwhelmingly in favor of keeping this article! — Qb27 (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete gnews reveals no extensive coverage. LibStar (talk) 11:48, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - WP:SPAM and no nontrivial coverage of subject (these three links are the best I could find 1 2 3). I couldn't listen to the interview, though - frankieMR (talk) 17:56, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.