Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles William Lucas, Jr.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 07:11, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Charles William Lucas, Jr.

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

NN academic; article promotes the subject's self-published pseudoscience but asserts no other notability Bm gub 14:47, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletions.   —David Eppstein 16:06, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. He fails WP:PROF, but that's not surprising given his alternative career track. More relevantly, the "references" are uniformly about other people's contributions to the stuff he's worked on rather than any kind of reliable source about his own work. He's a crackpot, sure, but he doesn't seem to be a notable crackpot. —David Eppstein 16:10, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as per above (although I had an amusing 5 minutes reading that article, amazing the things people will invent to "prove" their world view.... :-) --Crusio 16:31, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Pete.Hurd 18:35, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete--as the article said, he;s written a lot. As the references seem to show, nobody has noticed. Definition of non-notable. DGG (talk) 04:28, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete ROFL I ride his commuter bus back to Southern MD (MD 903, last one of the day). Claims to have been involved with inventing free electric generator that returns 1600% power back to grid (but held up by courts in all 50 states).  His "organization" does sell them in Europe for $20k (all the French McDonalds have them), invented electric car that came in 2nd at Indy 500 (but subsequently banned), consumer electric car that cant be marketed because it needs "catalytic converter" per government, sold his designed supercomputers to the US Government but it replaced so many government computers it made management look stupid so he was asked to leave...Dont believe me?  Ride that bus, sit anywhere and you will hear him for the next hour.  Crackpot?  you decide.  Yes, I have read his work.. Lot of mind-"boggling" concepts, nothing more... Stewysmoot
 * Delete Cannot find indication of notability. Cheers, :) Dloh cierekim  00:33, 30 September 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.