Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles chinedu Ndukauba


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:43, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

Charles chinedu Ndukauba

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non-notable media personality, and actor. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR]. Shoerack (talk) 22:43, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Actors and filmmakers, News media,  and Nigeria. Shoerack (talk) 22:43, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - autobiography by SPA editor. Does not come close to meeting notability criteria. Onel 5969  TT me 22:57, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete I have to agree. I've looked at the sources and am unimpressed for a number of reasons:  1-they look like blog entries and not journalistic sources; 2-the links provided don't link to any source we can check; and 3-the issues they "attempt" to source don't seem to have any WP:IMPACT.  I have some WP:PROMOTION concerns too.  I removed the request for a speedy delete because I didn't think it qualified under that criteria, but I'm glad it was brought up here.--Paul McDonald (talk) 22:59, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete All the sources in the article are not reliable and a Google search found no sources. Mucube (talk • contribs) 23:06, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Sources are blogs and user-created sites. I don't see much of anything for this person we can use for sourcing. Content creator that makes stuff to post online, rather routine these days in the social media world. He does seem like a happy person, always smiling. Oaktree b (talk) 03:31, 13 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete No reliable independent sources to meet WP:GNG. Belichickoverbrady (talk) 17:57, 14 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete. The subject fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. Majority of the sources in the article are unreliable. The subject doesn't have a career to speak of and is far too young to have any substiantial career at this time.  Versace1608   Wanna Talk? 01:33, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete promotional article. Dympies (talk) 17:25, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete and WP:SALT per above discussion, especially GNG. I also want to point out the obvious sock puppetry going on here. Bearian (talk) 20:49, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete lacks reliable independent sources fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 10:23, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete and SALT per all above. Best, GPL93 (talk) 15:21, 19 January 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.