Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charlie Huber


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 03:25, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Charlie Huber

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable hockey player and fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 05:59, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:27, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:27, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:27, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Keep Meets point 2. from WP:NHOCKEY Played one or more games in an amateur league considered, through lack of a professional league, the highest level of competition extant by playing in NZIHL and Australian Ice Hockey League as well as playing for New Zealand National Team even if it wasn't in the top pool for World Championship, I think between the two things it is enough for him to have a page. NZ Footballs Conscience (talk) 01:23, 21 July 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete Fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG. The New Zealand League and the Australian League is not considered a professional league of the caliber to satisfy point 2 (see WP:NHOCKEY/LA; "highest level of competition extant" means in the world, not in a country).  Also, the consensus has long been established that it has to be in the top level for the World Championship to satisfy point 6 (which NHOCKEY explicitly states).  Ravendrop 06:56, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades Godric  04:04, 28 July 2017 (UTC) Delete As per nom. DerbyCountyinNZ (Talk Contribs) 06:26, 30 July 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades Godric  06:01, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Lacks the significant coverage to meet WP:GNG and the accomplishments to meet WP:NHOCKEY. It's been stated many times that appearing at the lower tiers of the IIHF championships is insufficient to support a claim of notability. Papaursa (talk) 21:15, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete lack of the significant coverage to pass GNG, which must be met for an article, especially one on a living person, to be kept. That said the above debunking of the claim he meets the notability guidelines for hockey are persuasive. The notability guidelines for all sports are arguably over broad. The notion that an American football player can be considered notable for playing just a few minutes in the NFL is absurd. That we give the same defference to players in the Arena Football League is just not justifiable at all. However when we have individuals that do not even meet these very low standards, we need to delete the articles expeditiously.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:59, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fails NHOCKEY (Ravendrop's explanations being accurate), no evidence the subject meets the GNG.   Ravenswing   14:51, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails to meet NHOCKEY as they did not play in a league that meets the second criteria. Also I can find nothing that shows they meet GNG. -DJSasso (talk) 15:43, 8 August 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.