Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charlie the Unicorn By Jason Steele


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was merge and redirect to Jason Steele. delete, given the article that I originally was going to merge into was deleted at AfD as well. -  Daniel.Bryant  11:00, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

Charlie the Unicorn By Jason Steele

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable Flash cartoon and recreation of previously deleted article - see Articles for deletion/Charlie the Unicorn. No significant change in subject's notability - lots of Google hits due to common terms, but nearly all are blogs or Newgrounds-type links. No major citations in first 100 results or so. Delete MikeWazowski 06:05, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete lacks sourcing from significant independent sources, as required by WP:WEB.-- danntm T C 01:39, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Is this article even different enough from the old, deleted article to make this AfD necessary (vice speedily deleting as a recreation of deleted material)?  --ElKevbo 03:26, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Referring to research done -- http://www.spatulamadness.com/blog/?p=80 --, it has been viewed 8,000,000 times.  This sould be considered significant enough to warrant an entry, especially considering the other memes around.Greatal386 22:11, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep for basically the same reasons as stated by Greatal386. Cliph 21:49, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep for the aforementioned reasons. The article clearly meets the guidelines of WP:WEB, and there is really no question of its notability. 67.60.59.251 05:56, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep There is no doubt about the notability: you can find several remakes and t-shirts and the video is already widely known. Clearly, Wikipedia would miss something without this entry. obeyssac 20:14, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Zooobala 02:38, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep affirm no question of notability --Davidkazuhiro 02:41, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to the Jason Steele article. To those who've asserted that there is "no question of notability" I ask that you please provide reliable sources to that effect, beyond a tally of downloads.  (jarbarf) 00:40, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong delete no non-trivial, reliable sources. Most of the references are to blogs or the author's web site.  The one mention in a college paper calls it a YouTube classic but it is a one sentence example not a subject of the article.  [r:Eluchil404|Eluchil404]] 10:52, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[Use]
 * Strong keepthis cartoon has become very popular and the page does have a lot of information about its creator and other details that are interesting. I don’t see how this article is even being considered for deletion with all the people that have viewed it.[r:halo2994|halo2994]]12:03, 25 February 2007


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.