Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charlies (New Zealand)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Black Kite 12:04, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

Charlies (New Zealand)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Article has been marked as unnotable for over a year. There is no substantial content and have been no non-vandalism edits in attempt to revitalize the article. The content of the article seems to be more of a menu or catalog than an article. Mpdelbuono (talk) 04:40, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Rcurtis5 (talk) 18:19, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. I created the page by splitting it from another. It is a non-notable company. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 04:48, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Passes WP:CORP. Multiple nontrivial coverage by secondary sources., , , , , . 66.57.1.249 (talk) 05:05, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions.  —-- Alan Liefting (talk) - 06:10, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. Certainly has a high profile in New Zealand. Grutness...wha?  08:30, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Definitely notable per WP:CORP if you look on Google and Google News but article requires significant work to be a meaningful article.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 11:51, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 11:51, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note:I think I'm well on the way to fixing the article. While its probably not well known outside of NZ and Australia, the company does appear to be notable.  I'm working my way through the NZ Herald archives at the moment, but they've also been written about (non-trivial) in the Dominion Post, National Business Review, Australasian Business Intelligence,Food Industry Week (NZ) and are large enough to be included prominently in Reuter's market standings/industry research for the area. Shell   babelfish 12:45, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Has had quite a bit of news coverage over the years. --Helenalex (talk) 07:06, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.