Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charlotte Best


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Stifle (talk) 23:18, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

Charlotte Best

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Article about a young actress with a role in a popular TV series and another minor appearance. Was already deleted speedily several times but I happed to move it over a protected title without really noticing it, but does not yet seem to be notable enough in any case. Tikiwont (talk) 19:05, 29 September 2008 (UTC) 
 * Delete notability not established. --Dreamspy (talk) 19:51, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.   —Grahame (talk) 02:09, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and actresses-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  21:20, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:10, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:40, 6 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep has received enough coverage in reliable third party sources to meet the notability guidelines. RMHED (talk) 18:17, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Are you referring to the very short TV week info or to something else that you found? Thanks for clarifying.--Tikiwont (talk) 18:32, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
 * There was quite a bit of coverage about her 2008 Logie nomination. RMHED (talk) 18:34, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Well, that's something, although having won would make it a clear case and some cites would be good. I am not having a strong opinion here but had doubts about me inadvertently unprotecting it. --Tikiwont (talk) 18:52, 10 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete, I've been unable to find any coverage that was not completely trivial. Lankiveil (speak to me) 02:58, 11 October 2008 (UTC).


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.