Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charlotte Hawkins Flowers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to List of supercentenarians from the United States. I don't believe there is anything to merge, but if someone disagrees I would be happy to userfy it to them. J04n(talk page) 09:52, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

Charlotte Hawkins Flowers

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence of meeting WP:N's general guidelines - the subject got a brief burst of attention around her 112th birthday and death, but nothing to suggest meeting WP:N's requirement of making "a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in his or her specific field". Most of the material in the article (and available in the references) is nothing more than trivia. Canadian  Paul  23:31, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:32, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:32, 23 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Merge/redirect to List of supercentenarians from the United States. She's not notable enough for her own article, but it'd be a valid enough redirect to add to the list of supercentenarians in the USA. I believe that the precedent for articles is that once they reach supercentenarian status, they can be redirected to the appropriate article/list. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   04:58, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.