Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charlotte Hornets (WFL)



Charlotte Hornets (WFL)

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Result: Keep (non-admin closure) as information not being sourced can be rectified. Mr. C.C. Hey yo!I didn't do it! 17:42, 7 April 2010 (UTC)


 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

This reads as WP:OR or a snip from a sports report. Guy (Help!) 19:41, 6 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep. Clearly notable professional sports team.  This is a content issue, to be addressed by editing, not by deletion.  There are sixty-some versions of this article, going back almost 6 years.  One of these should work. TJRC (talk) 20:04, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Since the team competed on a fully professional level of sport, and since there is a LOT of coverage in third party sources, this article does not warrant deletion. There are content issues though. Recommend keep and violent stubbing. Aditya Ex Machina  20:13, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions.  —  Gongshow  Talk 22:04, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions.  —  Gongshow  Talk 22:05, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep World Football League team page? Yes, of course!  Widely sourced, verifiable, reliable sources--everything a growing article needs to be kept.--Paul McDonald (talk) 02:10, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep I added two links for people who want to know more about the WFL Hornets. Yes, there are other verifiable and reliable sources, but we need to make sure that those are included in the article.  This was an easy fix.  Mandsford (talk) 13:20, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep and close Seems like a good deal of information is there and asserts notability. All we need to do is source it and it will be fine.  I am also closing this as keep as there is nothing more to discuss.   Mr. C.C. Hey yo!I didn't do it! 17:42, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.