Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charlotte Moore


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Consensus is that there are insufficient reliable sources to pass WP:GNG. -Scottywong | communicate _ 16:42, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

Charlotte Moore

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I removed the misleading parts, as she was NOT in the movie, etc. Not notable. Linkedin, etc. Even the official website hasn't been updated since 2008. SPA article. Dennis Brown - 2&cent;    &copy;   Join WER 23:20, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete as a promotional article. No reliable independent sources to meet the WP:GNG. Vcessayist (talk) 01:08, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Well, I was able to find this newspaper article which appears to be about her when searching, as I was also considering taking this to AfD. I know it's probably not enough, but there's at least something out there about this person. Googling is admittedly ineffective for assessing notability in this case, as "Charlotte Moore" appears to be a fairly common name. CtP  (t • c) 02:06, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
 * What is most telling is the lede "Remember the name, because this 23 year old singer actress from Toronto is going to be a star someday", which tells me she wasn't a star then, and I haven't found anything that picks up where this prediction left off. Dennis Brown -  2&cent;    &copy;   Join WER 02:13, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable unless further sources can be found. I certainly don't disagree with Dennis Brown here; it looks like this person never had notable success after the publication of the article. CtP  (t • c) 03:16, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete: non-notable, unless further sources can be found. Per Dennis Brown. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 12:22, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
 * I am a student conducting research on Canadian Music Theatre and its influences etc. I wrote this article because I have personally met Charlotte Moore, so that makes it difficult to source. As far as her body of work, her resume on the Talent House website can be found here: http://www.talenthouse.ca/resumes/Moore_Charlotte.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Florence Emily (talk • contribs) 20:05, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
 * What we need to show notability is discussion (not just passing mentions) of Moore in independent, reliable sources (see the general notability guideline). The resume unfortunately does not qualify as an independent reliable source, but also be aware if you're having trouble finding sources online that any print sources are also acceptable. CtP  (t • c) 22:53, 7 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP: NACTORS, and has no reliable sources supporting it. --v/r Electric Catfish (talk) 21:08, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep if we can find a reference for the award (which indicates notability), otherwise merge into Mavor Moore. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:24, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:54, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
 * I found a better reference for her 1990 award, and have updated the article with it.  PK  T (alk)  16:11, 14 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep, I think her list of credits is substantial enough to believe she's notable, the issue becoming finding more reliable sources to back this up. The award helps establish notability as well, of course.  The tricky part here is that there are several Charlotte Moores listed in IMDB, and some of the TV/film credits for the Canadian Charlotte Moore have been mixed up with somebody else.   PK  T (alk)  16:11, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
 * I have found a couple more references and added them to the article.  PK  T (alk)  21:39, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm pretty sure her own uploaded bio at Talent House Inc. doesn't quality as a references. And http://tapa.ca/ wouldn't be independent of the "award" they granted here.  The key is no one else is talking about her, still.  Dennis Brown -  2&cent;    &copy;   Join WER 22:13, 14 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete The article references her mother and has no relevant information on the person in question. I do not believe it meets general notability guideline for secondary sources or as a biographical article.Righteousskills (talk) 18:00, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. She appears to be a veteran Canadian musical actress, from the sources I found. There's significant coverage of her in reliable independent sources that are national or regional in scope in Canada (look at this one and here and here). There's been significant coverage of her over the years in a number of reliable sources. I think people might be having trouble finding more sources because much of this coverage is in the 1980s and 1990s. It meets the WP:GNG requirements and the WP:NACTORS guideline on stage performances. --Batard0 (talk) 15:14, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.