Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charlotte Petrick


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. postdlf (talk) 22:36, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Charlotte Petrick

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Player in question does not meet notability requirements as outlined here. Does not meet any of the six possible criteria. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tkwb92 (talk • contribs) 01:20, 25 October 2014‎ (UTC)


 * Keep - probably speedy keep because the nominator made an error of assumption. She does meet the notability requirements listed since she is in the main draw of a WTA International event as listed at this official WTA draw sheet. This is also the nominator's very first edit to wikipedia and it's an AfD so probably just an error in judgement. Fyunck(click) (talk) 08:26, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep: Player is notable by project standards. Jared Preston (talk) 19:12, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 04:53, 2 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:31, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:31, 3 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep: Meets WP:NTENNIS #3 having played in the quarter-finals of a WTA International doubles match. Fuebaey (talk) 18:37, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep: She reached the quarterfinals of the 2014 Coupe Banque Nationale (WTA International tournament), so she is notable per WP:NTENNIS (point 3). JGab12 (talk) 16:10, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.