Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charlotte Proudman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 04:41, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Charlotte Proudman

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails notability guidelines for creative professionals. Veggies ( talk ) 03:17, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    03:28, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    03:28, 5 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete: We're not WP:LINKEDIN, and there are BLP issues as well -- everyone who reports a loser is not made notable.--Milowent • hasspoken  03:37, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per Milowent - Clearly a LINKEDIN-type article. – Davey 2010 Talk 19:49, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as I simply see nothing better. Pinging tagger . SwisterTwister   talk  06:16, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment, a case of WP:ONEEVENT? Coolabahapple (talk) 17:18, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Yeah that too . – Davey 2010 Talk 18:30, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:34, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:34, 12 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - Totally fails notability criteria. At best, a case of WP:ONEEVENT  Onel 5969  TT me 20:33, 13 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.