Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charlotte Strawbridge


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to It's Not Easy Being Green. (non-admin closure) Michaelzeng7 (talk) 18:32, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Charlotte Strawbridge

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Nominate for deletion Doesn't seem to meet WP:NOTABILITY as a musician. I think page should redirect to It's Not Easy Being Green, the reality programme Charlotte Strawbridge's family are a part of, and the thing she is known for. Boleyn (talk) 18:43, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Redirection doesn't require deletion. Phil Bridger (talk) 22:24, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:51, 29 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment the article itself would disappear, so I wanted to gain consensus. Boleyn (talk) 07:23, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:22, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash;  Yash [talk] 05:48, 10 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Redirect Per nom, no standalone notability at this point. Perhaps WP:TOOSOON so it might be worthy of expansion back to a bio later on. § FreeRangeFrog croak 21:34, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep #2 deletion spree. Unscintillating (talk) 01:18, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment Please. I've !voted in several of Boleyn's AFDs and I see no pattern other than bios tagged for years with notability concerns. Nothing wrong with stirring the pot once in a while. If anything, it's far more honest to bring these to AFD for consensus than to simply PROD them stealthily. If there is a specific agenda you're worried about here, I'd suggest you bring it up over at WP:AN instead. § FreeRangeFrog croak 01:23, 17 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Redirect per nom. Deletion spree or not, there are no reliable sources for this article.  --Cerebellum (talk) 04:30, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Redirect per nom, not sufficiently notable on its own.--Staberinde (talk) 17:19, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.