Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charlotte Wolff


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 01:33, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Charlotte Wolff

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Almost no content after removal of copy-vio material. Only a single ref and no assertion of any special notability. It would be as easy to create a new version as to rescue this one.  Velella  Velella Talk 22:42, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
 * very weak keep - Seems to have written several books on sexology.- Antonio AntonioMania Martin aca 14:25, February 13, 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:30, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:30, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:30, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:31, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:31, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:31, 14 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep. I'm finding both her writings about hands as a clue to personality and her advocacy of bisexuality as the natural human norm written about in the popular press, and in JSTOR I find a number of reviews of her books plus a full-length interview with her and extended mentions in feminist historical work. I'll be expanding this to demonstrate and use these sources; in my opinion she meets the general notability standard. (The German Wikipedia article is lengthy but since there has been copyvio, I'll keep things clear by building up a briefer article myself rather than translating that.) Yngvadottir (talk) 19:01, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
 * If you'll be expanding it, now is the time. Agricola44 (talk) 16:16, 18 February 2014 (UTC).


 * Keep or delete as just ridiculously incomplete. I agree that she's showing up as notable, a biography of Magnus Hirschfeld, various sexology stuff and .  The article is terrible however. Barney the barney barney (talk) 19:10, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep, noteworthy and notable deceased individual. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 02:33, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment. As it stands, there is no assertion of notability and no sources. Is text in the process of being added? Agricola44 (talk) 16:49, 17 February 2014 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.