Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charlsie Cantey


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:28, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

Charlsie Cantey

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Entirely unsourced stub without an assertion of notability. Apparently was a track reporter but the 1,380 ghits i found imply a very minor one. Isn't it time for Wikipedia to stop encouraging the creation of entirely unsoruced stubs, particularly for BLPs? Bali ultimate (talk) 13:09, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.  -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  15:26, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete No assertion of notability in the first place. Wholly unsourced.  Enigma msg  05:10, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

You're going to change your minds. You're basing everything on what was there. Vchimpanzee ·  talk  ·  contributions  · 15:31, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * What was I supposed to base it on? What wasn't there?  Enigma msg  19:08, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
 * What's there now hopefully solves the problem. Vchimpanzee ·  talk  ·  contributions  · 20:23, 6 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep The article is properly sourced, and Ms. Cantey is well known among fans of U.S. thoroughbred racing. Pastor Theo (talk) 00:41, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Pastor Theo (talk) 00:42, 9 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:20, 16 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep. Agree with the nominator's sentiments about discouraging the creation of unsourced BLPs, but in this case the article has been fixed up and I think it passes muster now.  Lankiveil (speak to me) 05:37, 16 May 2009 (UTC).
 * Keep. Now it has been worked on, this passes muster. Eddie.willers (talk) 18:55, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.