Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charmco Building


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. It is open to editors to merge, redirect, or draftify the article as a normal editorial action. Stifle (talk) 15:33, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Charmco Building

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails GNG and NBUILD. Article makes no claim of notability for the building. The community was named after the company (which already has an article), not the building. Sources in the article are not IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. No indication that the building - the subject of the article meets NBUILD, "Buildings, including private residences and commercial developments, may be notable as a result of their historic, social, economic, or architectural importance, but they require significant in-depth coverage by reliable, third-party sources to establish notability." Nothing properly sourced for a merge, redirect seems unneeded, but they are cheap if someone wishes to redirect.  // Timothy :: talk  07:50, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions.  // Timothy :: talk  07:50, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of West Virginia-related deletion discussions.  // Timothy :: talk  07:50, 28 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Merge and redirect to the company, if there's anything substantial to merge (doesn't look like it). SportingFlyer  T · C  16:29, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - nothing of any importance to merge (we don't need to know how long a building was vacant for, or when it was listed as sale pending). The curious thing is the article creator has given it an NHRP infobox, which if true, would provide the needed notability. However, clicking on the reference number brings up nothing, and searches within the NHRP database under "Charmco" or "Charleston Milling", also bring up zero results. Absence of inclusion in NHRP, the building does indeed not pass either GNG or NBUILD. If someone comes up with a different name for the building and that is NHRP, please ping me.  Onel 5969 ' TT me 15:04, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Would you consider draftificaiton given that it has been submitted to the NRHP? -- Whpq (talk) 18:45, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , absolutely.  Onel 5969  TT me 19:40, 5 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Draftify - The building is not NRHP listed, but a submission has been made. -- Whpq (talk) 18:43, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Charleston, West Virginia as a first resort. If an improved draft is accepted for review, it can replace the redirect at that point. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  11:13, 8 March 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.