Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charming Liars


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 22:18, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Charming Liars

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Following a google search, there is no apparent indication of notability. --Jax 0677 (talk) 17:06, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Could only locate primary sources for the band (official website, Facebook, twitter, etc). I think the ref title "New music discovery" from 2016 is evidence enough that the band is not notable enough for its own page. Cheers Comatmebro  User talk:Comatmebro 18:07, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:24, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:24, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * delete this is the only RS I could find - David Gerard (talk) 09:15, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
 * keep I added more information and sources about the bands formation and recent activities. I don't know if it meets noteworthy criteria, but the artist does have a growing audience. Musicnerd77 (talk) 17:09, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:06, 9 October 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * comment not convinced by new sources, still doesn't meet WP:NMUSIC - David Gerard (talk) 10:13, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 23:04, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
 *  Comment -, , this discussion has now been relisted twice, with no reason expressed for doing so, and few additional reliable sources. Care to comment on this? --Jax 0677 (talk) 14:03, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
 * It's had low traffic. At this rate, it will most likely be deleted, but usually I look for more discussion around the sources Musicnerd provided.  MBisanz  talk 00:35, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
 * I relisted for pretty much the same reason. Additionally, Musicnerd77 added several sources that, while not particularly strong, needed to be addressed before a clear-cut close could be made. Spirit of Eagle (talk) 17:15, 26 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Weak Delete I think this is WP:TOOSOON. The additional sources in the various South American Rolling Stone editions, do show a claim of significance. But they are either interviews in context of a tour/album release or a very brief piece about a music video. Usually for a notable band, there is solid secondary coverage. That is missing here. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 04:01, 2 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.