Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charter School of Wilmington/Clubs


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was DELETE. &mdash; J I P  | Talk 13:29, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

Charter School of Wilmington/Clubs
Subpages for articles meant to be apart of WP are a violation of WP:SP. Charter School of Wilmington/Faculty also fits this criteria. Pepsidrinka 06:41, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Faculty subpage now has an AfD tag, which points to this discussion. This is now a combined nomination for the two sub-pages Saberwyn


 * Delete both as violations of WP:SP, and for lacking in content relevant to an encyclopedia article on the school. I will support a merge of some or all of the material on the Clubs sub-page, if it can be demonstrated that this information is 'notable' enough to be a productive inclusion in the main article. Saberwyn - The Zoids  Expansion Project 09:54, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete Both. Per Pepsidrinka and Saberwyn - blatant violation of WP:SP. Perhaps some of the clubs can be merged into the main article, but faculty is non-notable unless there are individuals that prove otherwise. As a side note, the main article stays, per Wikipedia precedent to keep high schools and merge non-notable primary schools into the article about their district. -Rebelguys2 12:06, 29 December 2005 (UTC)


 * As a wikipedian who is working on these articles, I should tell you all that the lists are being held in those locations temporarily while summaries can be written about the few clubs of importance (those with national awards) and award-winning faculty. Perhaps we could move the sub-page articles to the talk page while the summaries are written and then include the final summaries in the main encyclopedia entry.  Under Allowed Uses in WP:SP, it says "Drafts of major article revisions, i.e. Example Article/Temp (These can also be subpages of the article's talk page.) Do not use subpages for permanent content that is meant to be part of the encyclopedia.".  If you would prefer it to be clearer that the articles are temporary or would prefer that they be moved to the Talk Space, that is fine.  But I do not support the deletion of them. --R6MaY89 14:21, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Userfy as per R6MaY89. --Cyde Weys votetalk 15:42, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete vilates WP:SP and clubs and faculty all seem nn. At most put them back into the main article. --Pboyd04 15:45, 29 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.