Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chase Evans


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Core desat 02:24, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Chase Evans

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Already speedied once under the name Chase evans, and an apparent clear COI - sole contributor:. Bringing it over here to get a once-and-for-all decision on whether this passes WP:PORNBIO or not. Procedural nom, so I abstain. —  iride scent   (talk to me!)  20:11, 9 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:COI. STORMTRACKER   94  20:39, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment COI isn't a deletion reason - there is nothing in WP:COI to forbid writing about yourself as long as it's done from a WP:NPOV - which this is, since all he does is say who he is and what he's done. If he said "Chase Evans is the best porn star ever", that would violate WP:COI. —  iride scent   (talk to me!)  22:33, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

why would you delete it --Chaseevans 22:19, 9 October 2007 (UTC) *Delete Hasn't been around long enough yet to satisfy WP:PORNBIO. Borderline spam.--Sethacus 05:19, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Doesn't meet the standards for inclusion listed at WP:PORNBIO, and a remarkably small number of films (two) cited.  Accounting4Taste 23:11, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I've changed my mind and tagged for speedy delete as spam. We'll see how that goes.--Sethacus 05:29, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy was denied. I'll still vote delete.--Sethacus 20:20, 10 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete. Fails WP:PORNBIO, and blatant violations of WP:COI get no presumption of good faith. --Legis (talk - contribs) 00:51, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per Legis. Also lacks any reliable source for verification. -Jmh123 18:35, 13 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.