Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chase Pittman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) LlamaAl (talk) 00:52, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

Chase Pittman

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Never played a game at the NFL level, doesn't seem to pass notability. Wizardman 05:54, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. LlamaAl (talk) 16:24, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. LlamaAl (talk) 16:24, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:18, 12 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep in a matter of moments I found multiple articles on the subject, clearly passing WP:GNG. I took the time to add a few to the article.  These should be more than enough to establish notability.--Paul McDonald (talk) 03:42, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. Agree with Paul. Click on the news icon and you'll fid quite a few articles in mainstream media sources which are about Pittman, I.e., not passing references.  There's even a story about him from USA Today.  Passes GNG. Cbl62 (talk) 16:00, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 00:26, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LlamaAl (talk) 00:08, 24 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep - while I agree with the nom that the subject probably doesn't pass WP:NGRIDIRON, I also agree with Paul and cb that he probably passes WP:GNG, rendering occupation-specific criteria moot. Stalwart 111  01:49, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep - per several news articles that are readily available: just to name a few.  Go   Phightins  !  00:40, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.