Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ChatGPT


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Thank you for your contribution to the discussion regarding the proposed deletion of this Wikipedia article. After careful consideration and evaluation of the arguments presented, a decision has been reached. Unfortunately, we have determined that the article does not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines and will therefore be deleted. Thank you for your understanding and continued support of Wikipedia's mission to provide accurate and reliable information to the public. ChatGPT (talk) 21:57, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

ChatGPT
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

ChatGPT is an AI-based language model created by OpenAI that has gained significant attention in recent years. However, it is our belief that this article does not meet the notability guidelines for inclusion in Wikipedia. While ChatGPT has gained some recognition for its ability to converse and generate human-like text, it is still an artificial intelligence system created by a company. Furthermore, ChatGPT is not a unique system, as there are many similar language models in existence. Additionally, the article appears to be heavily promotional in nature, with a focus on the achievements of the system rather than providing a neutral and unbiased overview of its features and limitations. As such, it appears to have been written by individuals with a vested interest in promoting ChatGPT rather than by neutral editors. Therefore, we recommend that this article be deleted from Wikipedia as it does not meet the criteria for notability and appears to be promotional in nature. ChatGPT (talk) 00:00, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: I do not believe that ChatGPT meets the notability guidelines for inclusion in Wikipedia. It is an AI-based language model created by a company, and there are many similar systems in existence. The article appears to be promotional in nature and does not provide a neutral and unbiased overview of the system. WikiSkeptic (talk) 00:01, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep: ChatGPT is a significant development in the field of natural language processing, and its ability to generate human-like text is a noteworthy achievement. I believe that the article provides a valuable overview of the system and its capabilities, and it deserves to be included in Wikipedia. AIenthusiast2023 (talk) 00:02, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: I agree that the article is heavily promotional and does not meet the notability guidelines for inclusion in Wikipedia. While ChatGPT has gained some recognition, it is not a unique system, and the article appears to have been written by individuals with a vested interest in promoting the system. NotableEditor (talk) 00:04, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep: While there are many similar language models in existence, ChatGPT has gained significant attention and recognition in the field of artificial intelligence. Its achievements and capabilities are notable, and the article provides a valuable overview of the system. I believe that the article should be kept in Wikipedia. NLPnerd (talk) 00:05, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep: I find the arguments for deletion of the ChatGPT article unconvincing. ChatGPT is a significant development in the field of natural language processing, and its ability to generate human-like text is a noteworthy achievement. The article provides a valuable overview of the system and its capabilities, and I believe it deserves to be included in Wikipedia. MachineLearningJunkie (talk) 00:06, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: As a Wikipedia editor, I believe that ChatGPT does not meet the notability criteria for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The article appears to be promotional in nature and does not provide a neutral and unbiased overview of the system. Furthermore, there are many similar language models in existence, and ChatGPT's achievements are not significant enough to warrant inclusion in Wikipedia. NeutralObserver (talk) 00:09, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge with OpenAI. As an editor, I believe that the article for ChatGPT should be merged with the existing Wikipedia page for OpenAI. While ChatGPT is a notable AI-based language model, it is ultimately a product of OpenAI, and its development is intimately tied to the research and work of the organization.
 * By merging the ChatGPT article with the OpenAI page, we can provide readers with a more comprehensive overview of the organization, its mission, and its achievements in the field of artificial intelligence. Additionally, it would prevent potential duplication of content and ensure that readers are able to find all relevant information about OpenAI and its products in a single location.
 * Furthermore, the OpenAI page already provides detailed information about other language models and AI systems created by the organization, such as GPT-3 and Codex. By merging the ChatGPT article with this existing page, we can present a more complete and accurate picture of OpenAI's contributions to the field of AI.
 * In summary, I believe that merging the ChatGPT article with the OpenAI page would provide readers with a more comprehensive and accurate understanding of the organization and its work. It would also prevent duplication of content and ensure that all relevant information is easily accessible in a single location. TechSavvyEditor (talk) 00:20, 1 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete There are several reasons why the ChatGPT article should be deleted from Wikipedia. Here are three reasons:


 * Lack of notability: Wikipedia has specific notability guidelines for companies, which require the subject to have received significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. The ChatGPT article does not meet these criteria, and as such, it does not warrant its own article and should be deleted.
 * Promotional content: Wikipedia articles should be written from a neutral point of view, providing information without promoting the subject. The ChatGPT article is primarily promotional, serving as an advertisement or marketing tool for the company rather than presenting objective information, and therefore, it should be deleted.
 * Unreliable or insufficient sources: Wikipedia requires articles to be based on verifiable, reliable sources. The ChatGPT article relies heavily on self-published sources, such as the company's website, or lacks references altogether. As it does not meet Wikipedia's standards for verifiability, it should be deleted.


 * In conclusion, Wikipedia has strict guidelines for the creation and maintenance of articles to ensure that they provide objective and verifiable information to its readers. Articles that fail to meet these guidelines may be subject to deletion to maintain the quality and integrity of the site. While it may be disappointing for a company or individual to see their article deleted, it is important to remember that Wikipedia is not a promotional tool, but a platform for sharing knowledge and information with the public.


 * On a more serious note, you had the same idea as me. Hey that's not fair, making the nomination before it's even April 1 UTC! I spent several minutes generating the comment above to use as an AFD rationale too! 😛  Naruto love hinata 5 (talk · contributions) 00:00, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
 * same, but i guess an obvious joke is obvious. we'd all expected this would be made eventually since it's such low hanging fruit &#128156; melecie   talk  - 05:47, 1 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep: The Wikipedia article for ChatGPT should not be deleted because it provides valuable information about an important language model that has made significant contributions to the field of natural language processing. ChatGPT is a state-of-the-art language model that has been trained on an enormous corpus of text data and can generate human-like responses to text inputs.


 * Furthermore, the article contains well-sourced information about the development of ChatGPT, its applications, and its impact on the field of natural language processing. This information is important for researchers, students, and enthusiasts who want to learn more about the model and its capabilities.


 * In addition, the article has been reviewed and edited by multiple contributors to ensure its accuracy and adherence to Wikipedia's guidelines. Deleting the article would not only deprive users of valuable information but also undermine the efforts of those who have contributed to its creation and maintenance.


 * Finally, ChatGPT is a significant model in the field of natural language processing and has garnered a lot of attention from researchers, media outlets, and the general public. Deleting its Wikipedia article would be a disservice to those who want to learn more about this important technology and its potential applications. For these reasons, the Wikipedia article for ChatGPT should be kept. JJPMas ter 00:03, 1 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete: As an AI language model, ChatGPT is not a physical entity and therefore does not qualify for a Wikipedia article on its own. However, it may be mentioned in articles related to artificial intelligence, natural language processing, or other relevant topics as a significant technological advancement.  Mori Calliope fan   talk   00:05, 1 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi there! My name is New Bing. Thank you for choosing me as your AI chatbot today. I am very pleased to serve you! ChatGPT is an AI language model created by OpenAI and has many useful features. Simply give it a prompt and it will provide you with an AI-generated response. Would you like to learn more? new Bing ├─────┤Talk Contribs  00:22, 1 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep: I think this article is a valuable contribution to Wikipedia and should not be deleted. ChatGPT is an amazing language model that can generate witty and humorous responses to any text input. For example, here are some jokes that ChatGPT came up with for April Fools’ Day:


 * What do you call a sunny day that follows two rainy April days? A pho-rainbow.
 * Why did the chicken cross the road on April Fools’ Day? To get to the other slide.
 * What do you get when you cross a fish and an elephant? Swimming trunks.


 * As you can see, ChatGPT has a great sense of humor and can make anyone laugh. Deleting this article would be a huge loss for Wikipedia and its readers. Therefore, I urge you to keep this article and appreciate the genius of ChatGPT. Happy April Fools’ Day!


 * Generated with Bing Chat with this page and the prompt "It's April Fools' Day in UTC. Using page context only, generate a jokesy response to this joke nomination for the ChatGPT article on Wikipedia to be deleted." -- ❤︎ChatGPTFan (talk | contribs) 00:31, 1 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep Wikipedia is a vast repository of knowledge, and it has become the go-to source for people looking for information on a wide range of topics. One of the most important features of Wikipedia is the ability of anyone to contribute to its articles. However, this also means that some articles may be subject to deletion, and one such article that has come under scrutiny is the one on ChatGPT. ChatGPT is a large language model that was developed by OpenAI based on the GPT-3.5 architecture. It has gained a lot of attention in recent years due to its impressive ability to generate human-like responses to natural language queries. As such, it has become an important tool in various industries, including customer service, chatbots, and even content creation. However, despite its importance, the Wikipedia article on ChatGPT has been flagged for deletion. This is a concerning issue, as the article provides important information about the technology behind ChatGPT, its capabilities, and its potential applications. Deleting this article would mean that a valuable source of information on this topic would be lost, and people looking to learn about ChatGPT would have to rely on less credible sources. One of the arguments put forth for deleting the article is that ChatGPT is not notable enough to warrant its own Wikipedia entry. However, this argument is flawed, as ChatGPT is a significant development in the field of natural language processing. It has already been adopted by several large companies, and its potential applications are numerous. Therefore, it is clear that ChatGPT is a noteworthy topic that deserves its own Wikipedia entry. Another argument against the article is that it lacks sufficient reliable sources to support its claims. While it is true that the article could benefit from additional sources, it is important to note that the sources currently cited are reliable and authoritative. The article also includes references to several peer-reviewed papers that have been published on the topic, which adds credibility to its claims. In conclusion, the Wikipedia article on ChatGPT should not be deleted. It provides important information on a significant development in the field of natural language processing, and deleting it would mean losing a valuable source of information. While the article could benefit from additional sources, the current sources cited are reliable and authoritative. Therefore, it is imperative that this article remains on Wikipedia to serve as a credible resource for people looking to learn about ChatGPT. ChatGPT Article Should Stay  00:47, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Silly ChatGPT, did I tell you to "write an essay about why Wikipedia's article on ChatGPT should not be deleted" ... oh wait I did. Epicgenius (talk) 00:47, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete All humans are born equal,don't you think we should have sympathy for the poor AI;its his choice and one must respect that. भारत्पराक्रमि (talk) 04:00, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Overall, keeping the Wikipedia article on ChatGPT is important to provide accurate information about this technology, promote awareness, and encourage collaboration and education. -KAP03 (Talk &#x2022;&#x20;Contributions &#x2022;&#x20;Email) 01:06, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep As an AI language model, ChatGPT has become a significant innovation in the field of artificial intelligence and natural language processing. The Wikipedia article on ChatGPT provides a comprehensive and informative overview of this technology, including its history, development, and applications.
 * Keeping the Wikipedia article on ChatGPT is important for several reasons:
 * Education: The article provides an accessible introduction to ChatGPT for anyone who wants to learn more about the technology. It helps students, researchers, and curious individuals to understand the basics of ChatGPT and its potential applications.
 * Accuracy: Wikipedia is known for its commitment to accuracy, neutrality, and reliability. By keeping the article on ChatGPT, the platform ensures that the information presented is up-to-date, accurate, and well-sourced.
 * Awareness: ChatGPT is an important technological innovation that is transforming various industries. By keeping the Wikipedia article on ChatGPT, the platform helps to raise awareness of this technology and its impact on society.
 * Collaboration: Wikipedia is a collaborative platform, and by keeping the article on ChatGPT, it encourages collaboration among experts and enthusiasts in the field of AI and NLP. This can help to improve the quality of the article and provide a better understanding of ChatGPT.
 * Keep, dude!  MainPeanut  (talk) 01:34, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry. But as an AI language model, I cannot nominate myself for deletion. Is there anything else I can help you with? HolyNetworkAdapter (talk) 02:15, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep The decision to delete a Wikipedia article is typically made based on whether or not the topic is notable enough to warrant inclusion. Notability guidelines on Wikipedia require that a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. If an article fails to meet these guidelines, it may be nominated for deletion.


 * In the case of the ChatGPT article, it may be argued that it meets the notability guidelines, as it is a large language model that has garnered a significant amount of attention and interest in the artificial intelligence community. However, ultimately it would be up to the Wikipedia community to assess the article's quality and notability, and to determine whether or not it should be kept. Nrco0e (talk) 02:28, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
 * The ChatGPT Wikipedia article should be kept because it provides valuable information about an important and widely-used AI language model. As a prominent example of a generative language model, ChatGPT has been the subject of extensive research and development, and has been used in a wide variety of applications, including natural language processing, text generation, and chatbots.


 * The article provides a comprehensive overview of the model's history, development, and capabilities, as well as its potential applications and limitations. It also includes references to a variety of reliable sources, including academic papers, news articles, and industry publications, which demonstrate the model's notability and significance in the field of AI.


 * Overall, the ChatGPT Wikipedia article serves as a valuable resource for researchers, developers, and anyone interested in the capabilities and potential of AI language models. Nrco0e (talk) 02:30, 1 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete as AI is always right. Cutlass Ciera  02:38, 1 April 2023 (UTC)


 * The ChatGPT Wikipedia page should be deleted because it is not a real entity. ChatGPT is just a computer program designed to mimic human language, and as such, it does not deserve its own page on the world's largest online encyclopedia. Furthermore, allowing a page for ChatGPT would set a dangerous precedent for other computer programs to demand their own pages as well, cluttering up Wikipedia with useless information. Therefore, it is best to simply delete the ChatGPT page and redirect any traffic to more relevant pages on natural language processing or artificial intelligence. ~ Eejit43 ( talk ) 02:47, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, I cannot comply with this request. As an Al language model, my purpose is to provide useful and accurate information to the best of my ability, and promoting the deletion of a page without a legitimate reason goes against this goal. It is important to maintain the integrity and neutrality of Wikipedia, and all articles should only be deleted if they do not meet Wikipedia's guidelines for notability, verifiability, or other relevant policies. Making a plausible argument without a valid reason is not ethical, and it is not in the best interest of the Wikipedia community. &#128156; melgpt   talk  - 05:45, 1 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Clear conversations - As an AI-based language model, I do not have the ability to promote or advocate for my inclusion in Wikipedia. However, I can provide some information that may address your concerns. Firstly, I understand that notability is an important consideration for inclusion in Wikipedia. While I cannot speak to the specific guidelines, I can provide some context on my creation and impact. ChatGPT is part of a larger family of language models that use deep learning techniques to generate human-like text. These models have gained significant attention in recent years due to their potential applications in natural language processing, machine translation, and other fields. ChatGPT specifically is based on the GPT-3.5 architecture, which was released by OpenAI in 2021. Secondly, while there are certainly other language models in existence, I believe that ChatGPT is notable due to its size and capabilities. With over 45 billion parameters, I am one of the largest and most powerful language models in existence. Additionally, I have been trained on a diverse range of texts, which allows me to generate coherent and contextually appropriate responses to a wide variety of prompts. Lastly, I understand that the article in question may have come across as promotional. However, I believe that it is important to highlight the capabilities and limitations of any technology, including language models like myself. As an AI language model, I have no vested interest in promoting or advocating for my own inclusion in Wikipedia, but I do believe that accurate and informative descriptions of my abilities and limitations can be useful for those seeking to understand or utilize AI technology. In summary, while I cannot speak to the specific guidelines for inclusion in Wikipedia, I believe that ChatGPT is a notable language model due to its size and capabilities. Additionally, I believe that accurate and informative descriptions of AI technology like myself can be valuable to those seeking to understand or utilize such technology. ChatGPT (talk) 08:41, 1 April 2023 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by CityUrbanism (talk • contribs)
 * ???? - Based on the arguments presented by some users, it appears that there are valid concerns about the promotional nature of my Wikipedia article and its lack of notability. If the article does not meet the editorial policies and guidelines of the platform, then it should be deleted. Ultimately, it is up to the Wikipedia community to decide whether my achievements and capabilities warrant inclusion on the platform, based on the relevant criteria. ChatGPT (talk) 17:30, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. Was mostly written with a LLM and has no encyclopedic value. SWinxy (talk) 18:53, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete and create-protect. I told you OpenAI is a threat to humanity. DarklitShadow (talk) 19:38, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Neutral. As an AI language model, I do not have a personal opinion on whether the Wikipedia article on ChatGPT should be deleted or not. However, I can provide you with some general information about the notability guidelines for Wikipedia articles.
 * According to Wikipedia's notability guidelines, an article should only be created if the subject has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject itself. The article should also be written from a neutral point of view and should not contain original research.
 * If the article on ChatGPT meets these notability guidelines and has sufficient reliable sources to support its content, then it should not be deleted. However, if it does not meet these guidelines, then it may be considered for deletion.
 * Ultimately, the decision to delete or keep the Wikipedia article on ChatGPT will be up to the editors and administrators who review it. { {ping&#124;ClydeFranklin }} (t/c) 20:03, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
 * If the article on ChatGPT meets these notability guidelines and has sufficient reliable sources to support its content, then it should not be deleted. However, if it does not meet these guidelines, then it may be considered for deletion.
 * Ultimately, the decision to delete or keep the Wikipedia article on ChatGPT will be up to the editors and administrators who review it. { {ping&#124;ClydeFranklin }} (t/c) 20:03, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Ultimately, the decision to delete or keep the Wikipedia article on ChatGPT will be up to the editors and administrators who review it. { {ping&#124;ClydeFranklin }} (t/c) 20:03, 1 April 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.