Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chatr (HP-UX command)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 19:17, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Chatr (HP-UX command)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not warrant its own article per WP:NOTDIC. Liam987 (talk)  21:58, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom. -- Orduin  Discuss 23:55, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete – We do have articles on many of the better known Unix commands, but this one is just a linker tool that operates on object files. The only people who need it are programmers using HP compilers. They can read the manual. – Margin1522 (talk) 00:56, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:22, 13 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. It's a very bad idea to start creating even more of these UNIX commands.  We've already got too many articles on trivial UNIX commands, and the last thing we need is a walled garden of how-to guides based on a specific UNIX variant.  If it were up to me, we'd be deleting the whole lot of them, but that didn't go too well last time I argued it. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:01, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - I'd have to agree with the deletes, that this seems to be a pretty niche, unencyclopedic topic; but that's interesting, Ninja. Do you recall anyone's 'keep' reasoning (or where I might find that discussion)?  AdventurousSquirrel (talk) 09:50, 19 March 2015 (UTC)\
 * Delete per NOTDIC]. Agree with Margin1522's reasoning. APerson (talk!) 13:23, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.