Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ChatterEmail


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 01:17, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

ChatterEmail

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Tagged for notability for 5 years; I couldn't establish notability Boleyn (talk)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 23:37, 14 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment Speedy keep #2 deletion spree. Unscintillating (talk) 03:41, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment Nominating a large number of articles - all of which have been tagged for notability for at least 5 years - does not meet speedy keep no. 2. Boleyn (talk) 08:56, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - google search turn up coverage in reliable sources PC Magazine, and PC World . Article was, however, created by an SPA as possibly promotional. Dialectric (talk) 12:48, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 01:12, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Delete It's just an app, and those sources don't provide any significant information about it. Shii (tock) 11:27, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 03:58, 27 January 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.