Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chattha Villages In Pakistan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:40, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Chattha Villages In Pakistan

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Completely unsourced, no notability. — Шαмıq   ☪   тαʟκ✍ @ 22:18, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:56, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:56, 23 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete: Unless it can be sourced. Notability less of an issue (because all populated places are notable) than WP:V at this point.--Milowent • hasspoken  02:44, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
 * It is still a non-notable topic. No sources cover the topic of ‘Chattha’ villages in Pakistan. According to WP:GNG:


 * If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article or stand-alone list.


 * "Significant coverage" means that sources address the subject directly in detail, so no original research is needed to extract the content. Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention but it need not be the main topic of the source material.
 * And here the issue is that no source covers the subject, so it fails the very first requirement for being notable. And as to verifiability, agreed with Milowent. — Шαмıq   ☪   тαʟκ✍ @ 18:57, 23 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 21:17, 29 September 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.