Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chaubandi Cholo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) st170e talk 03:04, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Chaubandi Cholo

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Completely non-notable topic. Obviously made up by the creator, no claim of significance. Fails WP:GNG, considered per WP:NOT. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 13:57, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 13:57, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 13:57, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170e talk 01:03, 14 December 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Anarchyte  ( work  &#124;  talk )   06:33, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete for lack of notability. Deathlibrarian (talk) 08:52, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep: The British Museum reference in the article says "Description: A woman's blouse, a 'chaubandicholo'". Even conjecturing that some translation misunderstanding had been introduced in that acquisition, Google Books is returning quite a number of snippet views discussing this garment. (See also this book page discussing cultural significance.) These indicate some potential for expansion and seem inconsistent with the "Obviously made up by the creator" suggestion in the nomination. AllyD (talk) 09:05, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - good nomination, but I think enough authoritative sources exist to make this notable. They are difficult to find however because apparently a popular musical group uses the same name. I edited the article and added some sources.--Rpclod (talk) 22:37, 21 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.