Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chaudhari Kumbharam Arya


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 21:54, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

Chaudhari Kumbharam Arya

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Completely unreferenced article. Fails WP:SIGCOV 4meter4 (talk) 12:48, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:53, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:53, 20 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep: The following link (https://parliamentofindia.nic.in/ls/lsdeb/ls10/ses15/p2711_2.htm) shows that 'Kumbha Ram Arya' was a Member of Parliament and is a pass of WP:POLITICIAN: ....politicians ((are notable if they have been)) members of legislative bodies at those national levels''. It might be worth double-checking the spelling of the name as they appear to be different in the source and on the page. Also article needs additional verification for bold statements like 'most popular leader of farmers'. nearlyevil  665  14:43, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep: Article is not unsourced, it has a link to parliamentofindia which indicates he was an MP and MLA from Rajasthan hence passes WP:NPOL.--Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 15:58, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep was a member of the Lok Sabha, therefore meets WP:NPOL RationalPuff (talk) 10:55, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep as per finding of others above. WP:NPOL can definitely be confusing for new folks since it sorts of overrides WP:GNG and one would start to wonder how this is possible! Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 15:43, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
 * That is a very good question. I think at some point we will realize this was a poor decision.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:35, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep The sources are reliable and the article is notable too.Aloolkaparatha (talk) 06:55, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Sources? There is only a single source, and it is a primary source. Additionally, the name of the subject is spelled differently in that source. Did you even look at the article or read the above comments before voting? 4meter4 (talk) 22:25, 24 June 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.