Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chavda dynasty


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. The nominator has not provided any valid reason for deletion, and has serious WP:COMPETENCE issues, as evident from the user talk page messages regarding sourcing, assessments and GA reviews. utcursch &#124; talk 14:14, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

Chavda dynasty

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Reason: Chavda dynasty is not belong to chaulukiya dynasty chavda dynasty article have same information as chaulukiya dynasty article and this article is presenting wrong ansectrial evidence. Kharari (talk) 04:03, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2019 June 8.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 04:17, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep Disagreement with content is not a valid reason for deletion. The topic is notable and does not have same information as Chaulukya dynasty., if you have concerns regarding the content of the article, you may post on Talk:Chavda dynasty. Deletion request is not for it.-Nizil (talk) 05:34, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
 * disagree with your opinion. both article have same information I think you not read it properly. -- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kharari (talk • contribs)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:45, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:45, 8 June 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.