Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chaz Stevens


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ST47 (talk) 04:34, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Chaz Stevens

 * – ( View AfD View log )

promotional paid editing. The many refs are either self-authored or represent the subjects other attempts at promotionalism. Some newspapers apparently tolerate this, but WP is an encyclopedia  DGG ( talk ) 05:29, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:00, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:00, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:00, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:00, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:01, 14 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete an overly promotional article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:14, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. So promotional I would consider speedy deletion. Quite impossible to separate out any substance from it in this state. Vanamonde (Talk) 16:51, 21 October 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.