Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Checkmarx (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete per consensus and per CSD G4. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:03, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

Checkmarx
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

Subject lacks significant coverage in reliable third party sources and fails to meet the notability guidelines for organizations. Alpha_Quadrant   (talk)  19:23, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:37, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:37, 13 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete (Again) Lack of coverage means fails WP:GNG, also promotional. Is this a CSD G4 ? Mt  king  (edits)  07:10, 13 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete as lacking in-depth coverage by independent third party sources. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:22, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.