Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cheerleader Days


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. NW ( Talk ) 03:36, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Cheerleader Days

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Not notable series. It has not even been produced yet. Dr.K. logos 18:19, 16 September 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:35, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Like its sister series Style 101: Teen Edition (which has already been speedied), this appears to be a production effort by a new company, but from the article (and the related IMDB entry) it is not clear that the production is slated for a television run, or will exist solely as a web series. No prejudice about recreating the article if the series takes off. (Note: the producer (Scott Hamilton) is not the Scott Hamilton of figure skating fame.  Don't be fooled by the erroneous information and videos on the IMDB page.)  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 19:41, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment Thanks for the detailed analysis and the expert advice. Take care. Dr.K. logos 20:02, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete - Agreed with WikiDan61. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball - it doesn't have article in case things become notable, and this isn't notable yet.  Once it gets screened somewhere it might be a good time to recreate the article (possibly in a way that makes it clearer what the series is, why it's notable, and separates out the series' plot from the fact of its existence and the details of its production). - DustFormsWords (talk) 03:34, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - I edit a lot of webseries pages; there's no outside coverage of any type yet for this, even by news sources that cover new media. --Milowent (talk) 12:57, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.