Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cheeses…

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was redirect to Cheeses...(of Nazareth). – ABCD 02:40, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Cheeses%85
This article is a duplicate of Cheeses%85%28of_Nazereth%29, which has been recently voted for keeping here on VfD. However, this one is an orphan, and contains less info than the other one. For these two reasons, I suggest a delete. Sarg 12:48, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirects are cheap, so merge and redirect Davelong 13:22, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * I'd say Redirect but, unless I'm much mistaken, using the elipsis character in the title makes it impossible to search for. Typing "Cheeses..." in the search box currently gets you nowhere, so there's no point in making this a redirect. I say Delete, and am personally creating the article Cheeses... (that's with three dots) and redirecting it to Cheeses%85%28of_Nazereth%29. &mdash; Asbestos | Talk  14:04, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Hmmm... How bizzare. I had trouble turning Cheeses... into a redirect for Cheeses%85%28of_Nazereth%29, using special characters or no, and now Cheeses... itself has dissapeared, deleted all of a sudden by User:Ahoerstemeier, who apparently didn't realize I was still editing it... I've got to go, so wash my hands of this. Sorry. &mdash; Asbestos | Talk  14:27, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Sorry, now I fixed it. Redirects with URL-encoded stuff like %85 don't work, and apparently the article title was also misspelled as it showed as a red link for me. andy 14:59, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)


 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.