Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chef Brian


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was a general agreement to Redirect to Ctrl Alt Del (webcomic), with no consensus on what to do with the old content, which can be found here. Be WP:BOLD and merge it if you see fit. &mdash;  F REAK OF N URxTURE  ( TALK )  08:50, Dec. 21, 2005

Chef Brian
Honestly, as much as I love CAD, I have to say this article should be deleted. Chef Brian is non-notable, garnering only 949 hits on google Kross | Talk 15:48, 12 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete--Kross | Talk 15:48, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Well, applying that logic, if I look up your name on google and it gets less than 1000 results, you should be deleted? Also, Chef Brian, with " before and after, scored 78 000 hits on my google... Maybe there should simply be an article about all the characters in CAD. That would make a bigger article and not have to delete anything. The PA 16:28, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment. The hell does that even mean, "you should be deleted"?  And the reason "Chef Brian" brings back 78000 hits is because the majority of the results are for Chefs NAMED Brian.--Kross | Talk 23:26, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Just pointing out your logic isn't great. The PA 01:57, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Bullshit. My logic is sound.  The search results I got from Google were for the character.  Yours were of real chefs with Brian as their first name.  And I don't have a frickin Wikipedia article, moron.--Kross | Talk 07:12, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Oh, name calling now!!! Yay, what an interesting topic this is becoming. If you weren't too lazy to read around you'd notice there are suggestions on what to do with the article, so you should maybe pay attention to that since you're the one who started this. The PA 17:30, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete and redirect to Ctrl Alt Del (webcomic). --Syrthiss 16:31, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge content (such as it is, if it's even possible) with Ctrl Alt Del (webcomic) and redirect. The CAD article already has character summaries. (Also remove the link to Chef Brian at that character summary, clicking it and getting the same article may confuse some readers) ++Lar 16:46, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Agreed The PA 17:56, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
 * A redirect is the obvious thing to do. You don't need an AFD nomination for anything you could have solved yourself by merging and redirecting - David Gerard 17:49, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
 * By redirect you mean sending queries for Chef Brian to CAD (webcomic), right? The PA 17:56, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment. The information in the article isn't really worth merging.  Not to mention that I doubt anybody would seriously search Wikipedia for an article about him.--Kross | Talk 23:26, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Well, some people might, but then if they are, they probably already know who he is, so yeah, I'll admit my baby article is getting euthanasia. The PA 01:57, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge. Not that there really is much that isn't in CAD, but a footnote and that sort of thing. --Maru (talk) Contribs 05:39, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Better to Delete but this should not stay whatever the case and consensus seems to have about formed so I will  vote Merge. Eusebeus 16:09, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge into main comic article. Dread Lord C y b e r S k u l l ✎☠ 23:20, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, possible redirct to CAD. The article is short, and the only redeemable parts are already incorporated into the main CAD article. Fancruft. I say that, even though I'm a die-hard CAD fan. -^demon 18:17, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. There are no other articles for other CAD characters, and there is already information on Chef Brian in the CAD article. --WindFish 04:25, 20 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.