Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chelsea Premium Outlets


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:08, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

Premium Outlets

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Notability is not inherited. Premium Outlets is part of the unquestionably notable Simon Property Group, but I do not believe Premium Outlets has standalone notability. SchuminWeb (Talk) 23:46, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak keep or merge to Simon Property Group. The outlets are pretty widespread, but I can't seem to find many sources of them that don't also relate to Simon proper. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Many otters • One hammer • HELP) 00:11, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep: It's got quite a few pages linking to it and Schuminweb has reason not to like me because I left them a message on their talk page yelling at them for erasing a redlink I added. I think redlinks are good and hate when people erase them. Daniel Christensen (talk) 03:22, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - This article indicates that they are the "world's largest outlet developer, owner and operator". This would indicate that this particular chain is sufficiently notable for its own article.  But at the very least, it would be a merge.  I see no reason for deletion here. -- Whpq (talk) 13:46, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.