Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chemical Records


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 00:44, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Chemical Records

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence of meeting WP:ORG. Unreferenced for six and a half years now. Proposed deletion contested by new account created today, whose sole edits so far have been to revert nine proposed deletions. Altered Walter (talk) 13:58, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Altered Walter (talk) 13:58, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Altered Walter (talk) 13:58, 7 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. Agree as one of the nominators. GregorB (talk) 14:01, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 17:32, 14 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. I'm unable to find evidence that this subject meets WP:GNG, WP:ORG, or WP:WEB at this time.  Gong   show  02:02, 15 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment This is transcluded twice in the AfD page for this date. --Colapeninsula (talk) 10:27, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Well spotted, thanks. I've removed the duplicate re-listing, which was made just a few minutes after the first one - must have been an edit conflict. Altered Walter (talk) 12:37, 15 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete Unable to find significant coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. Davewild (talk) 20:21, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.