Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chemical waste

add to this deletion debate

Probably a worthy subject, but as it is, a sub-stub, practically a dicdef (and not even a good one) Dukeofomnium 02:47, 4 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * delete if not expanded by April 9. --Jiang 06:22, 4 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * Redirect to industrial waste as was done one year back. Jay 06:47, 4 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. It has potential for a lot of information. SD6-Agent 10:40, 5 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep, do not redirect to industrial waste since there are other important kinds of waste (biological, radioactive). Important topic. Wile E. Heresiarch 16:07, 6 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep - as noted above, this is a topic that can be greatly expanded and has relevance. This is a very usefully stub for further expansion and no need for some arbitrary time criterion expansion. Lestatdelc 22:26, Apr 7, 2004 (UTC)