Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chen Shi-hui


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Tone 19:45, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

Chen Shi-hui

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I see nothing in WP:MUSIC that yells out notability in this case, and the person doesn't seem notable to me. Delete. --Nlu (talk) 09:31, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:25, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep -- The New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians is a reliable secondary source and sufficient indication of notability. Anyone covered by another encyclopedic reference is considered notable enough for inclusion in Wikipedia. The Guggenheim Fellowship and the Rome Prize are considered prestigious awards. Pkeets (talk) 00:04, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep per her entry in Grove. If it's good enough for Grove, it's good enough for Wikipedia + the awards, which are very prestigious. Note also that this article is linked from Music encyclopedia topics. Why not check "What links here" before proposing an article for deletion? Voceditenore (talk) 09:29, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep per WP:SNOW. With two notable award wins and Shi-hui's entry in Grove this subject is clearly notable. This was not a well thought out AFD nom.4meter4 (talk) 16:11, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. Just one more affirmation that Grove is authoritative and it would very odd for us to delete an article on a topic where they include an article. If you are thinking about proposing deletion of a classical music article and want to know if something is in Grove, the people at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Composers (I among them) would certainly be willing to help you. Opus33 (talk) 23:39, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.