Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chen Shiqiang (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:30, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Chen Shiqiang
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Delete - This article is not notable to be added on Wikipedia. AdamSmithUS (talk) 16:03, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment. I fixed this nomination after accidentally added it to the first AFD discussion. postdlf (talk) 16:10, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 20:01, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 20:01, 26 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  D u s t i *Let's talk!* 05:36, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

 Delete as not notable.--DThomsen8 (talk) 03:16, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment. We do need to avoid systemic bias when we can, and in the last AfD, an IP put forward a plausible though not overwhelming case for notability, most likely through WP:POLITICIAN. The main problems are that while one or more of the posts he has held may meet this standard, I don't know how to verify this for Chinese posts - and that the only verification I have found for his holding any of these posts is a mention in a French-language news story of his membership of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference. We badly need someone to do a search for reliable Chinese sources, and either add them to the article or bring them back here. PWilkinson (talk) 09:07, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.