Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cheng-Siang Chen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.  MBisanz  talk 01:44, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

Cheng-Siang Chen

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails WP:N and WP:RS, no improvements in a year+. Wizardman 17:15, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I prefer the sources were actually integrated in the article, but i am satisfied at what's been found. Wizardman  01:11, 19 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment No opinion on deletion, but his Chinese WP article appears to have references. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  18:33, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. I've fixed the url for the Encyclopedia Britannica reference, which verifies the facts in the article so it doesn't fail WP:RS any longer. As for notability, the fact that he was chosen to write such a high profile article for Britannica demonstrates that he is regarded as one of the leading experts in his field, as do these 251 book references. Phil Bridger (talk) 15:24, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep based on the references found by Phil. Edward321 (talk) 23:38, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  23:28, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions.   -- RayAYang (talk) 06:36, 18 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.