Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chennaiyil Oru Mazhaikalam (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 04:34, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Chennaiyil Oru Mazhaikalam
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

This film has been shelved, no more news since last year, while director and cast and crew have moved on and have become busy with other projects! Johannes003 (talk) 09:47, 23 July 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  —Johannes003 (talk) 09:47, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:54, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. It is now firmly residing in the depths development hell--Sodabottle (talk) 05:17, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Comment. The fact that there is no news "now" or that the project has been canceled (or in "development hell") are not reasons to delete. If there was significant coverage in reliable sources in the past, then the article passes WP:N and should be kept. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:12, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The coverage was mostly press releases and announcements and trivial mentions in articles about the people involved.--Sodabottle (talk) 06:31, 30 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete or wikify, no word about the film's development for a year or more actually. The director and lead actress of the film seem to be talking only about their other future projects in the media and not mention a word about this film, as if they completely forgot about it. EelamStyleZ (talk) 23:28, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.