Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cheollima Civil Defense


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  03:52, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Cheollima Civil Defense

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

1. There is only one source. 2. Too much content needs to be verified.

"Proof of this is beyond rare and no real findings have proved the legitimacy of this multi-national "rescue group" claim, and once more, many in the Western European intelligence agencies as well as the US/ROK's joint entities, feel such a concept seems ridiculous, even to the casual observer. Numerous sources have corroborated that it would not need four nations to assist Kim Jong-Nam's family and son, who's video is really "the only proof", as several US NSA/CIA analysts have said, to back up the other narrative. "In fact, there would be so nothing to gain for the US to dedicate personnel, aircraft, fuel, assets on the ground, etc...All just to repatriate a handful of defectors unless some type of espionage operation would be in action, and even then, there are so many other avenues to accomplish that very objective that require ten times less the amount of resources and, more importantly, geopolitical risk" the sources inside the US Joint Special Operations Command and CIA said sternly when asked about the group." 3. This paragraph is almost a comment. O1lI0 (talk) 23:12, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:04, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:37, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:04, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete The article itself implies that the organization is a WP:HOAX and sources do not support coverage as a hoax. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 17:58, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as a non notable hoax. z'L3X1 (distænt write)  02:38, 1 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.