Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cher's awards


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. It's cut and pasted from the main article and since there haven't been significant edits to it (besides a POV intro), there's nothing to merge. - Bobet 15:40, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

Cher's awards
Unless I'm wrong, this should remain in the Cher article, should it not? User is creating multiple Cher-related articles similar to this. Seinfreak37 02:17, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, consists basically only of a relatively small table that could be added back into the main Cher article. --TBC TaLk?!? 02:28, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

If this were the case...then shouldnt most of madonna's pages be brought back to the main article? im only makin space for the main article because if one day it gets bigger ur gonna have to take it off Rsf7589 02:44, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Madonna's award page is much longer (around 57 kb) and more detailed, whereas this page simply consists of a single table.--TBC TaLk?!? 02:59, 16 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete. Don't see any reason why this shouldn't be part of the main article. If for some reason the Cher article eventually grows into some sort of montrosity, then seperate pages might be needed, for now however, its just a waste. AmitDeshwar 07:50, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete or Merge with main article. -- Al e  x  (talk) 14:02, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge with main article. Just add a separate section to the main article. I don't see why it shouldn't be merged (referring to AmiDeshwar's response) -- Nish kid 64 00:37, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge is best, and if not keep. Iola k ana • T  19:15, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

just so there is no more problems ive merged it back with the main cher article so this page is no longer necessary Rsf7589 14:09, 17 September 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.