Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cheri Caffaro


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. I see a consensus for this meeting WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG. It has not been 7 days yet but WP:SNOW applies here. (non-admin closure)  Coco bb8  (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 21:33, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Cheri Caffaro

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

The subject fails to meet WP:GNG. The first link on the reference which is the official website is a dead link. Secondly other link still doesn’t show any independent of the subject. Did my google search still can’t find any sign of notability of the subject neither any news independent of the subject. Meligirl5 (talk) 19:25, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Actors and filmmakers. Meligirl5 (talk) 19:25, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:28, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  20:53, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep - Fairly meets WP:NACTOR. My, oh my! (Mushy Yank)  22:26, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
 * She still doesn’t meet WP:NACTOR. I understand you might have seen her as an actress who has appeared in multiple notable movies just because the movies are on Wikipedia also. But after checking some of the movies she appeared which are on Wikipedia I come to found out that some of the movies doesn’t meet WP:NFP neither WP:NFSOURCES. Note should be taken that IMDb is not considered a reliable source for proving notability.
 * To presume notability, reliable sources should have significant coverage which of the movies fails including the actress not passing the general notability guideline. I’m pretty sure those movies would have been rejected if it was submitted through the WP:AFCREVIEW so therefore they will have to go through the WP:AFD.--Meligirl5 (talk) 12:40, 2 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Keep Lots of newspaper coverage back in the 1970s when she was active. Meets the GNG at the very least. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 GoldenAgeFan1 (talk) 01:28, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep: the sources GoldenAgeFan1 found leaves little doubt to me. Skynxnex (talk) 13:42, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep per GoldenAgeFan1's sources, which demonstrate notability. Toughpigs (talk) 15:24, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep: GoldenAgeFan1's sources provide valuable insights into the notability of the topic.  Waqar 💬 17:20, 5 May 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.